Quasicategories, the ∞-Categorical Comparison, and the Joyal

Job: develop the quasicategories / Joyal model, the model→∞ comparison (Lurie), the ∞-operads, and the presentable / combinatorial ∞ — with the Joyal vs Quillen sSet as the worked example.

Core

The quasicategories and the Joyal model

Quasicategory / Joyal / Quillen Description
Quasicategory \(\mathbf{sSet}\) the Joyal model, fibrant = quasicategories (the higher categories)
Joyal vs Quillen Joyal the \((\infty,1)\), Quillen the \((\infty,0)\) (the higher categories)

The model → ∞ and the comparison

Model → ∞ / \(\mathcal{M}[\mathcal{W}^{-1}]\) / Lurie Description
Model → ∞ \(\mathcal{M}\) the model, \(\mathcal{M}[\mathcal{W}^{-1}]\) the ∞-category (the Lurie)
Comparison \(\mathrm{Ho}_\infty(\mathcal{M})\simeq\mathcal{M}[\mathcal{W}^{-1}]\) (the higher categories)

The ∞-operads and the model

∞-operads / \(\mathcal{O}^\otimes\) / Lurie Description
∞-operads \(\mathcal{O}^\otimes\) the ∞-operad (the Lurie, the higher categories)
Model / operad the model the operad (the higher categories)

The presentable / combinatorial and the ∞

Presentable ∞ / combinatorial Description
Presentable ∞ the category theory / accessible, the higher categories
Combinatorial / ∞ combinatorial model → presentable ∞ (the higher categories)

See it

\(\mathbf{sSet}\) the Joyal (quasicategories) vs the Quillen (Kan) and the model → ∞. The Joyal: \(\mathbf{sSet}\) the Joyal model (fibrant = quasicategories, the higher categories). The Quillen: \(\mathbf{sSet}\) the Quillen model (fibrant = Kan, the \((\infty,0)\)). The model → ∞: \(\mathcal{M}[\mathcal{W}^{-1}]\) the ∞-category (the Lurie, the higher categories). The key point: the Joyal the quasicategory, the Quillen the Kan, the model → ∞ the Lurie.

Check

Explain the Joyal model structure on sSet and the comparison with the Quillen.

The Joyal: \(\mathbf{sSet}\) the Joyal model (weq = categorical equivalences, fibrant = quasicategories, the \((\infty,1)\)-categories, the higher categories). The Quillen: \(\mathbf{sSet}\) the Quillen model (weq = weak homotopy equivalences, fibrant = Kan complexes, the \((\infty,0)\) = spaces, the topology). The comparison: the Joyal the \((\infty,1)\), the Quillen the \((\infty,0)\) (the Joyal the fibrant = quasicategory, the Quillen the fibrant = Kan). The model → ∞: the \(\mathcal{M}[\mathcal{W}^{-1}]\) the ∞-category (the Lurie, the higher categories, the \(\mathrm{Ho}_\infty\simeq\mathcal{M}[\mathcal{W}^{-1}]\)). So the Joyal the \((\infty,1)\), the Quillen the \((\infty,0)\), the Lurie the comparison.

Explain the ∞-operads and the presentable ∞-categories.

The ∞-operads: the \(\mathcal{O}^\otimes\) the ∞-operad (the Lurie, the \(\otimes\) the cocartesian, the higher categories). The presentable ∞: the category theory / accessible the presentable, the higher categories the ∞. The combinatorial: the combinatorial model → presentable ∞ (the higher categories). So the ∞-operads the \(\mathcal{O}^\otimes\), the presentable the category theory.

Pitfalls

  • The Joyal the \((\infty,1)\) (the quasicategories, the higher categories) — the Joyal the \((\infty,1)\), the Quillen the \((\infty,0)\).
  • The model → ∞ (the \(\mathcal{M}[\mathcal{W}^{-1}]\), the Lurie) — the Lurie the comparison, the \(\mathrm{Ho}_\infty\simeq\mathcal{M}[\mathcal{W}^{-1}]\).
  • The ∞-operads (the \(\mathcal{O}^\otimes\), the Lurie, the higher categories) — the ∞-operads the cocartesian, the Lurie.
  • The presentable ∞ (the category theory / accessible, the higher categories) — the presentable the ∞, the combinatorial the model.

Refs

  • Joyal, "The theory of quasi-categories" (2008); the Joyal model
  • Lurie, Higher Topos Theory (2009); the model → ∞, the presentable ∞
  • Lurie, Higher Algebra (2017); the ∞-operads, the \(E_\infty\)
  • Cisinski, Higher Categories and Homotopical Algebra (2019); the comparison

Next

MC index · Foundations · Bousfield & Localization · Stable & Spectral · Combinatorial & Left-Determined · Higher categories · Category theory