Models, Semantics, and the ∞-Topos

Job: develop the simplicial model (Voevodsky), the ∞-topos semantics (Shulman), the cubical / presheaf model, and the set-theoretic / constructive — with the simplicial / ∞-topos as the worked example.

Core

The simplicial model and the Kan

Simplicial / Voevodsky / Kan / univalent Description
Simplicial model Voevodsky, \(\mathbf{sSet}\) the Kan, the univalent (the foundations)
Kan / univalent the Kan fibrations the univalent (the foundations)

The ∞-topos semantics

∞-topos / Shulman / internal language Description
∞-topos semantics Shulman: the \(\infty\)-topos the univalent (the infinity-topoi)
Internal language the infinity-topoi / internal language the HoTT (the foundations)

The cubical model and the presheaf

Cubical / presheaf / Cohen–Coquand–Huber–Mörtberg Description
Cubical model \(\mathbf{Set}^{\square^{\mathrm{op}}}\) the presheaf (the foundations)
Presheaf / cubical the cubical presheaf the univalent (the foundations)

The set-theoretic and the constructive

Set-theoretic / ZFC / constructive Description
Set-theoretic the ZFC the model (the foundations)
Constructive the constructive model (the foundations)

See it

Simplicial model \(\mathbf{sSet}\) (Voevodsky) and the \(\infty\)-topos semantics (Shulman). The simplicial: the Voevodsky the \(\mathbf{sSet}\) the Kan the univalent (the foundations). The \(\infty\)-topos: the Shulman the infinity-topoi the univalent (the infinity-topoi / internal language). The key point: the simplicial the Voevodsky, the \(\infty\)-topos the Shulman.

Check

Explain the simplicial model and the univalent universes in \(\mathbf{sSet}\).

The simplicial: the \(\mathbf{sSet}\) the Kan fibrations (the foundations, the Voevodsky). The univalent: the \(\mathcal{U}\) the universe (the Kan fibration the classifying, the \(\mathcal{U}\to\mathcal{U}\) the universal, the foundations). The univalence: the \(\mathsf{idtoequiv}:(A=B)\to(A\simeq B)\) the equivalence (the Voevodsky, the foundations). So the simplicial the Kan, the univalent the \(\mathcal{U}\).

Explain the \(\infty\)-topos semantics (Shulman) and the cubical model.

The \(\infty\)-topos: the Shulman the infinity-topoi the univalent (the every \(\infty\)-topos has a univalent universe, the infinity-topoi / internal language). The cubical: the \(\mathbf{Set}^{\square^{\mathrm{op}}}\) the presheaf (the Cohen–Coquand–Huber–Mörtberg, the foundations). The constructive: the cubical the constructive (the canonicity, the foundations). So the \(\infty\)-topos the Shulman, the cubical the presheaf.

Pitfalls

  • The simplicial the Kan (the Voevodsky, the foundations) — the simplicial the Kan, the univalent the \(\mathcal{U}\).
  • The ∞-topos the Shulman (the infinity-topoi) — the \(\infty\)-topos the univalent, the Shulman.
  • The cubical the presheaf (the \(\square^{\mathrm{op}}\), the foundations) — the cubical the constructive, the canonicity.
  • The set-theoretic the ZFC (the classical, the foundations) — the ZFC the model, the constructive the different.

Refs

  • Voevodsky, "The simplicial model of univalent foundations" (2009); the \(\mathbf{sSet}\)
  • Shulman, "All (∞,1)-toposes have strict univalent universes" (2019); the ∞-topos
  • Cohen–Coquand–Huber–Mörtberg, "Cubical type theory" (2016); the cubical / the presheaf
  • Bezem–Coquand–Huber, "A model of type theory in cubical sets" (2014); the cubical model

Next

HoTT index · Foundations · Cubical & Computational · Synthetic Homotopy · Univalent Categories · Infinity-topoi